Velociraptor ca. 1993 |
An
interesting thing happened when the Velociraptor was selected as the
habitual aggressor in the Jurassic Park franchise.
It is no secret that fossil Velociraptor is a very different creature
than the one that rampages across the silver screen. The film version is more like a related but
much larger dinosaur named Deinonychus. The
historical evidence suggests that the use of the scientifically inaccurate Velociraptor was less an artistic
choice made by Michael Crichton in 1990 and more a reflection of then available
dinosaur science.
Paleontologist
John Ostrom first discovered and described Deinonychus in 1969. Deinonychus was a game-changer for
the scientific community because it had unmistakable avian features in skeletal
structure. Beginning in 1969, scientists
began to think differently about dinosaurs.
The discovery of Deinonychus sparked what became known as the Dinosaur
Renaissance. Between 1969 and 1990 several paleontologists
played a huge role in this revival. Most
notably, Ostrom, Robert T. Bakker, and Gregory S. Paul. Bakker’s 1986 text, The Dinosaur
Heresies
directly confronted ideas about dinosaur biomechanics, body temperature, and
their evolutionary link with birds. In
1988, Gregory S. Paul published, Predatory Dinosaurs of the World. Paul’s text beautifully illustrated the paleontological
ideas of the Dinosaur Renaissance including feathered dinosaurs, and active,
flexible postures. Michael Crichton was
known for the depth and quality of scientific research put into his novels. Part of the popularity of his works was the
page-turning combination of fiction and hard science. Jurassic
Park is no
exception. It is clear that Crichton was
familiar with both Dinosaur Heresies and Predatory Dinosaurs because the ideas of both
texts are embedded throughout the novel.
Gregory
S. Paul is very important to this story.
When putting dinosaurs into order for 1988’s Predatory Dinosaurs, Deinonychus was filed under Velociraptor. The book shows Deinonychus under Velociraptor as the same species - literally
Velociraptor Antirrhopus synonymous with Deinonychus Antirrhopus. On page 367 Paul acknowledges that the
placement of Deinonychus is “rather unfortunate” but let the classification
stay nonetheless. Crichton would have
been writing Jurassic Park at this time and using Paul’s data simply chose
the most euphonious dinosaur name thus forever mixing film Velociraptor and fossil Deinonychus.
"Velociraptor Antirrhopus in a leaping attack" |
There
is further evidence to suggest this dinosaur switcheroo. On page 116 of Jurassic Park, Dr. Grant tells the
group that before coming to the Park he was digging up “an infant Antirrhopus.” Five pages later, Dr. Grant tells them about
the coordinated hunting of Velociraptor and how they could kill other dinosaurs
like Tenontosaurus. This would seem a pointless
anecdote except that on page 367 of Predatory Dinosaurs there is a dramatic black
and white line drawing of Velociraptor Antirrhopus attacking a Tenontosaurus. The behavior reported by the fictional
paleontologist is the exact same data reported by the real paleontologist in Predatory Dinosaurs. There is one more telling quote
from page 367 of Predatory Dinosaurs: “If alive today it would be considered a
big predator.” Surely this turn of
phrase was too good for Crichton to pass up.
Paul’s description (and drawing) of Velociraptor Antirrhopus is a ready-made Jurassic
Park killer
dinosaur. This simply cannot be a
coincidence.
Today
a firmer distinction is drawn between Velociraptor, and Deinonychus. One need only talk to a dinosaur obsessed
6-year old for ten minutes and they will quickly disabuse you of your
paleontological prejudices. The truth is
that 1988 dinosaur science informed the science fiction novel that led to the
creation of the Jurassic Park franchise.
We can certainly forgive any mix up between Velociraptor and Deinonychus when you consider that an
entire generation was inspired to marvel and wonder at these vanished animals. V1.N2
Next Episode: Part Two of V1.N1 "Jurassic Park: Fallen Kingdom Ruffles Some Feathers"
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.